PMXBOT Log file Viewer

Help | Karma | Search:

#aclarknet logs for Friday the 26th of June, 2015

(Back to #aclarknet overview) (Back to channel listing) (Animate logs)
[00:25:52] <PlockPins> [13pins] 15aclark4life pushed 1 new commit to 06master: 02http://git.io/vtGgq
[00:25:52] <PlockPins> 13pins/06master 14a28a4bc 15Alex Clark: Add files
[00:30:40] <PlockPins> [13pins] 15aclark4life pushed 1 new commit to 06master: 02http://git.io/vtG2I
[00:30:40] <PlockPins> 13pins/06master 141394b25 15Alex Clark: Move env to base
[16:13:24] <garbas> aclark: hey! did you took a look at current work?
[16:34:05] <garbas> ah you couldn't i broke the uu.task with last commit
[16:34:09] <garbas> anyway fixed now
[16:53:07] <aclark> garbas: looking now
[17:17:28] <aclark> garbas: looks good! https://github.com/upiq/uu.task/issues/10#issuecomment-115774749
[17:18:26] <garbas> aclark: hm first image looks like a bug
[17:18:56] <garbas> but having all 3 fields as "radio" boxes makes sense right?
[17:19:20] <aclark> garbas: yeah first image is "form load" i.e. first time you view that tab
[17:19:25] <aclark> garbas: yes that works well i think
[17:19:37] <aclark> it works great after you start clicking around for the first time
[17:19:41] <garbas> i see .. there is a race condition with loading. that is why i dont see it
[20:40:01] <garbas> aclark: just pushed last fixes and also now values get saved
[20:41:51] <garbas> aclark: i would need some feedback from you and supton ... i have 3 hours until i reach 25h as it is on the worksheet
[20:42:03] <garbas> if there is something else to work on
[20:42:35] <aclark> garbas: yep, will follow up with you tonight/tomorrow morning. Probably going to extend that a bit at least through Mon & Tues when you go AFK
[20:42:41] <aclark> !m garbas
[20:42:41] <pmxbot> you're doing good work, garbas!
[20:43:21] <garbas> aclark: mon/tue i will be able to work fulltime if needed.
[20:43:27] <garbas> fulltime==8h
[20:43:40] <aclark> garbas: if the widgets stuff is all done you could probably do the local roles stuff that supton mentioned
[20:43:43] <aclark> k
[20:44:46] <garbas> teamwork integration/
[20:44:47] <garbas> ?
[20:45:26] <aclark> dunno, that might be a lower prio; i'll find out. "local roles stuff" is basically making sure Project Manager and Assigned Party can do what they need to in terms of the app
[20:45:42] <aclark> So an assigned party may need a local role, or something like that.
[20:46:23] <aclark> Also we probably need to populate the form(s) w/project managers and/or assigned parties. Something like what c.task does.
[20:48:21] <aclark> (which we tried to build on top of but gave up on because it was too confusing. you could see if you see anything there worth using either by writing similar code or install_requires=c.task)
[20:51:13] <garbas> aclark: hmm, not sure i understand all the details. let me check c.task
[20:53:05] <aclark> garbas: c.task builds a vocab of users on the site that have certain roles e.g. Project Manager or Assigned Party (i.e. the person assigning the task and the person that is assigned to do the task.)
[20:53:13] <garbas> aha i get it assigned_group and assigned_user and enquirer
[20:53:32] <garbas> those fields need to be "moved" here
[20:53:49] <aclark> so, if i go to a uu.task site and use c.loremipsum to @@create-dummy-users … yeah, you get it.
[20:54:09] <aclark> And "enquirer" needs to be renamed
[20:54:44] <garbas> enquirer becomes?
[20:55:32] <aclark> Well, for uu.task we want assigned_group, assigned_user & project_manager I think
[20:56:20] <aclark> Or maybe assigned_user, assigned_group, pm_user, pm_group
[20:57:46] <aclark> It would be awesome if we could be super flexible in terms of being able to assign any combination of PMs & assigned parties … e.g. this task goes to user "Alex Clark" and group "State of California", but just making some simple form of that work first is the priority
[20:59:23] <garbas> i would say that you can assign it to only group or user
[20:59:44] <aclark> K
[20:59:58] <aclark> because… Plone? :-)
[21:00:16] <garbas> no, just from usability point of view
[21:00:52] <garbas> i can create a widget which can select/search for both user and group
[21:01:13] <aclark> That's fine
[21:01:16] <garbas> then we decide if it is Choice field or List field
[21:01:17] <aclark> I think that's what i mean
[21:01:20] <garbas> ok
[21:01:52] <garbas> i will create 2 fields then project_manager and assigned
[21:02:58] <aclark> But then I additionally mean Save X number of either users or groups to each field. So project_manager or assigned party can be "Alex", "Rok", "Framework Team"
[21:03:17] <aclark> but that's just a "nice to have"
[21:03:18] <aclark> k
[21:03:34] <garbas> yes, that is then a simple switch in the widget
[21:03:43] <aclark> k
[21:03:56] <garbas> project_manager = schema.List ... assigned_to = schema.List
[21:04:26] <aclark> garbas: i think that's what I was asking about here: https://github.com/collective/collective.task/issues/2
[21:05:06] <garbas> k, looks like we;re improving c.task functionality :)
[21:05:16] <aclark> +1 to schema.List
[21:05:17] <aclark> yeah
[21:06:05] <aclark> the other way that was discussed was a "CC:" field but I don't think I like that… or if I like that I like it in addition to all the afforementioned.
[21:06:23] <garbas> it would be also nice to be able to aquire values from parent
[21:06:30] <garbas> parent task
[21:06:41] <garbas> or taskplanner
[21:07:03] <garbas> example use case would be
[21:07:49] <garbas> - create a folder "Alex" and all task that are created there are assigned to "alex"
[21:08:07] <garbas> by default, if not specified differently
[21:08:27] <aclark> right
[21:08:47] <aclark> that's how sean pitched Task Planner i.e. "shared settings for tasks contained"
[21:10:09] <garbas> awesome. i think i'm slowly getting it :)
[21:14:06] <garbas> aclark: ok, i'm done for today. is it ok to start the work on project_manager and assigned_to patterns on monday?
[21:14:37] <garbas> that mean i will go over 25h
[21:14:42] <garbas> means*
[21:18:29] <aclark> garbas: yeah I'll get back to you by tomorrow a.m.; most likely yes, thanks!
[21:19:05] <garbas> perfect. i'll wait for your call on this