Log file Viewer
Help
|
Karma
| Search:
#dcpython logs for Monday the 6th of February, 2012
(
Back to #dcpython overview
) (
Back to channel listing
) (
Animate logs
)
[
17:49:24
] <
aclark
> richleland: you good2go for tomorrow? Almost 70 peeps!
[
17:49:52
] <
aclark
> kennethreitz: ping
[
17:50:00
] <
kennethreitz
> aclark: yo
[
17:50:22
] <
aclark
> kennethreitz: yo how'd you make that cookies.dat for fortune-service? Maybe'll make a non-offensive one and send you pull request
[
17:50:41
] <
aclark
> kennethreitz: right i have to redact "fuck" from everything
[
17:50:44
] <
kennethreitz
> aclark: that'd be awesome.
[
17:50:46
] <
aclark
> which is sub-optimal
[
17:50:59
] <
aclark
> s/right/right now/
[
17:51:13
] <
kennethreitz
> aclark: i took the forunes from hombrew's fortune forumla
[
17:51:15
] <
kennethreitz
> and packed them
[
17:51:21
] <
kennethreitz
> then also added the offensive collection
[
17:51:29
] <
kennethreitz
> so if you just exclude that completely, i think we're good
[
17:51:34
] <
aclark
> who knew there was so much lewd fortunes? :-)
[
17:51:34
] <
aclark
> ok
[
17:51:38
] <
kennethreitz
> those were a bit more offensive then i remember :P
[
17:51:42
] <
aclark
> yah
[
18:44:44
] <
papna
> kennethreitz: A lot of platforms ship their fortunes segregated
[
18:45:03
] <
kennethreitz
> papna: yeah, this module really sucks
[
18:45:22
] <
kennethreitz
> papna: but i'm too lazy to write my own ;P
[
18:45:45
] <
papna
> Getting a non-offensive fortunes.dat is probably better than trying to filter a mixed one.
[
18:45:52
] <
papna
> I can't tell if that's what he's saying he'd do.
[
18:45:59
] <
kennethreitz
> yeah, i vote for just taking them out completely
[
18:46:20
] <
kennethreitz
> we can have a seperate app for offensive ones if really neccesary :)
[
18:46:24
] <
papna
> aclark: This is the internet; it's hard to overestimate people.
[
18:46:59
] <
aclark
> papna: in case you have any interest in working on it: https://github.com/kennethreitz/fortune-service
[
18:48:14
] <
papna
> aclark: It looks pretty, erm, done?
[
18:48:24
] <
aclark
> papna: see my ticket
[
18:48:48
] <
papna
> Ah.
[
18:50:30
] <
papna
> Where is fortune.py?
[
18:50:32
] <
aclark
> papna: i was saying that until i can pass in ?offensive=0 i've been doing: return results.content.replace('fuck', '[redacted]')
[
18:50:37
] <
aclark
> which is not ideal :-)
[
18:51:19
] <
aclark
> but i must have fortunes! :-)
[
18:51:54
] <
papna
> https://github.com/goerz/fortune.py is a dependency?
[
18:52:33
] <
aclark
> oh there you go someone already did it, sort of
[
18:52:46
] <
aclark
> papna: no i think kennethreitz rolled his own
[
18:53:00
] <
kennethreitz
> i did not
[
18:53:11
] <
papna
> kennethreitz: You're depending on goerz's fortune library?
[
18:54:04
] <
aclark
> papna: just check the code
[
18:54:54
] <
papna
> aclark: I did, and I notice it's using a library called fortune. There's many fortune.py's out there, but it appears that is indeed the one, so it already has hooks to get innofensive fortunes.
[
18:55:08
] <
aclark
> papna: ah cool
[
19:00:29
] <
richleland
> aclark I'm good - can you send me details on the location though? contact phone #, when I can get in, etc.?
[
19:00:56
] <
aclark
> richleland: sent to rich@richleland.com
[
19:00:59
] <
richleland
> made some major progress on multi-mechanize over the weekend
[
19:01:04
] <
aclark
> w00t
[
19:01:07
] <
richleland
> totally rebuilt the report output
[
19:01:15
] <
aclark
> awesome
[
19:01:16
] <
richleland
> got rid of the matplotlib/numpy dependency
[
19:01:39
] <
richleland
> I'm really curious to see what kinds of things people want to perf test