Log file Viewer

[12:22:27] <deepy> I've sent a pull request now

[13:53:01] <aclark> deepy: got it! thanks

[17:31:25] <ElectricTriangle> I've been trying to figure out how to install Pillow in python3.2 to no avail, does anyone here know how to do that?

[17:31:41] <Arfrever> Yes.

[17:33:07] <ElectricTriangle> Well I was more interested in how to install it in Python3.2.

[17:33:20] <ElectricTriangle> As opposed to who actually knows how to do that.

[17:33:25] <ElectricTriangle> Do you think you could help me out?

[17:33:28] <Arfrever> In the same way as in any other version of Python.

[17:33:49] <ElectricTriangle> Look, I don't ask stuff unless I've tried it already.

[17:34:06] <Arfrever> What operating system?

[17:34:18] <ElectricTriangle> I'm using Debian Linux.

[17:35:18] <ElectricTriangle> The problem is the methods I've tried compile and install it for 2.7, which is not what I'm after.

[17:36:10] <ElectricTriangle> Those methods being the setup.py file included with the source and pip

[17:36:56] <Arfrever> python3.2 setup.py install ${potential_options}

[17:38:28] <ElectricTriangle> Returns something about not having setuptools for python3.2

[17:39:35] <Arfrever> Personally I would firstly install in a temporary root. E.g.: python3.2 setup.py install --root=/tmp/root

[17:39:48] <ElectricTriangle> Yes, but that doesn't work.

[17:42:20] <Arfrever> http://packages.debian.org/sid/python3-setuptools suggests that Debian has a version of Setuptools for Python 3.3. Why are you trying to install something for Python 3.2?

[17:42:37] <wiredfool1> you're missing python3-setuptools

[17:42:38] <ElectricTriangle> Well that was rather silly of me not to check sid.

[17:42:43] <ElectricTriangle> Yes, I got that.

[17:43:12] <Arfrever> Anyway you can download tarball from https://pypi.python.org/pypi/setuptools and install manually.

[17:43:14] <wiredfool1> it's really the same on all supported pythons after that

[17:44:10] <ElectricTriangle> Ah, thanks.

[17:44:54] <ElectricTriangle> Arfrever, since you were curious... the reason I'm using 3.2 is because I'm working with raw data. I find that 3.2 is more well-suited to that.

[17:46:41] <Arfrever> Better-suited than 2.* or 3.3?

[17:46:56] <ElectricTriangle> Better-suited than 2.x

[17:50:15] <Arfrever> (I would recommend to switch to 3.3...)

[17:50:26] <ElectricTriangle> Any particular reason?

[17:51:42] <ElectricTriangle> I mean, does it do what I'm after better, have speed improvements, etc?

[17:52:57] <Arfrever> Python 3.2 does not receive any bug fixes (except security fixes) from upstream since 2013-05-15.

[17:53:27] <ElectricTriangle> But I don't have any bugs...

[17:53:47] <ElectricTriangle> Also I'm not particularly fond of installing packages from Sid.

[17:54:00] <Arfrever> You might read http://docs.python.org/3.3/whatsnew/3.3.html

[17:54:17] <ElectricTriangle> Although I suppose I could compile it.

[18:11:53] <ElectricTriangle> Thanks for your assistance.

[18:24:27] <ElectricTriangle> I might have to build from source anyway, it seems the package manager got a bit behind... these dev headers in the repository are too old.