[02:32:58] <lifeless> dstufft: I'm pottering through the consequences of the initial review
[02:33:49] <dstufft> lifeless: for the record, I don't feel very bad if deletes and "wierd" things like that break, though if we can get a solution where they don't that's better. I do care about the leakage between runs with different indexes and such
[02:35:04] <dstufft> I don't feel very bad about duplicating into the wheel cache dir, but I would prefer it not do that just for disk space savings (plus the http cache will handle more edge cases better)
[02:35:37] <dstufft> I think those were the major questions I saw in the bit i read in email
[02:36:20] <lifeless> I want to ignore, it can be covered by 2567 if/when thats done
[02:36:31] <lifeless> the different indice thing, ok - I will address
[02:38:01] <dstufft> not using the --find-links logic and instead manually replacing links in a cache keyed by the url would solve that problem I think, the different indexes thing and it would also fix the deleted file thing at the same time. Not sure how hard it would be to do that though off the top of my head
[02:38:42] <dstufft> it could also solve the duplicate bit if you just made it conditional on whether the link that PackageFinder discovered was already a wheel or not
[02:39:40] <lifeless> not really, because the logic that triggers that is the same that is used for pop wheel
[02:39:50] <lifeless> the lookaside bit is the read-back aspect
[02:43:29] <dstufft> lifeless: fwiw I know a good number of people who have been waiting for this feature and who are excited to see it being worked on