Log file Viewer

[16:10:02] <jaraco> !norris StevenK

[16:10:03] <pmxbot> StevenK once kicked a horse in the chin. Its decendants are known today as giraffes.

[16:10:12] <StevenK> Haha

[16:10:48] <dstufft> jaraco: updated

[16:10:57] <dstufft> https://github.com/python/psf-salt/commit/01cb412cb4dd585014848732ac3dcbda268f814b

[16:26:10] <jaraco> dstufft: Can you get Setuptools Developers admin on /pypa/setuptools?

[16:26:37] <jaraco> I’m currently unable to turn on Travis CI integration.

[16:26:56] <dstufft> jaraco: try now

[16:30:58] <jaraco> dstufft: works, thanks. https://travis-ci.org/pypa/setuptools

[16:31:17] <jaraco> !fm dstufft

[16:31:17] <pmxbot> Vous bossez bien, dstufft!

[16:59:12] <Arfrever> Access list should be migrated.

[19:40:32] <jaraco> Ha. Check this out - latest setuptools was deployed much more simply - just `bumpversion patch` then push. Travis did the rest.

[19:40:55] <jaraco> drat - docs didn’t make it though.

[19:41:11] <jaraco> I’ll deal with that later.

[20:17:38] <agronholm> jaraco: hey, I was wondering -- are there plans to support the metadata 2.0 related keywords in setuptools?

[20:17:48] <agronholm> run_requires, meta_requires etc.

[20:19:08] <jaraco> agronholm: no plans specifically. If those things affect builds, then it makes sense for setuptools to honor them.

[20:19:42] <agronholm> jaraco: so would you be accept a PR that implement them?

[20:19:45] <agronholm> -be

[20:20:27] <agronholm> if these are to gain any traction at all, setuptools *must* support them

[20:20:33] <jaraco> Certainly.

[20:20:38] <agronholm> ok, good to know

[21:08:53] <Arfrever> dstufft || jaraco: https://github.com/orgs/pypa/people and https://bitbucket.org/pypa/profile/members should be synchronized.