[13:10:18] <ronny> jaraco: sorry for being pushy, may i assume that at best you will find time in the next week for the review of setuptools_scm branch metadata support?
[21:39:24] <techalchemy> I dont know who wrote your guys' vendoring script but it's pretty nice
[21:47:32] <dstufft> I know pf_moore was thinking about writing such a lib :)
[21:48:19] <dstufft> does this need to be vendored though? seems like it's a lib so vendoring would be best left to the end tooling if needed? idk
[21:49:18] <techalchemy> yeah most likely that's true
[21:49:39] <techalchemy> mostly just wanted a clean place to see the vendoring tools in action
[21:50:16] <techalchemy> actually I will unvendor in case anyone actually uses
[21:50:27] <techalchemy> I was going to just slap this in pipenv but i figured it might have some other uses
[21:51:00] <dstufft> techalchemy: there's ~talks~ about the future of virtualenv, and such a library was one of the things that we talked about splitting out of venv to better handle all the cases, so +1
[21:53:15] <techalchemy> for us it's just that so much of our cude has become a jumbled and difficult to follow pile of uh... organized beauty