[01:31:41] <techalchemy> it catches edge cases, specifically I think we implemented it for a case where we needed to normalize a name that only had a post release
[01:31:48] <techalchemy> they had deleted the original release
[01:32:35] <dstufft> techalchemy: if there's use cases that only exist in the xmlrpc we def need to know those so we can either explicitly declare them unsupported, or support them.
[01:32:44] <njs> mbacchi: heh, I just wrote what sounds like it might have been the same script you're writing last week. https://gist.github.com/njsmith/f45b20aafbcbab4fe11c06fab588427a
[01:32:51] <techalchemy> yeah I need to verify, the package was ibm-db-sa-py3
[02:30:42] <altendky> techalchemy: is pipenv only testing on appveyor now? or is something going on on the phabricator instead of travis?
[02:36:25] <techalchemy> altendky: it's testing on buildkite on a big DO node
[02:36:50] <altendky> techalchemy: i'll have to read up on that, thanks.
[02:37:07] <techalchemy> they dont have a public view mode yet but it's my understanding that they will shortly
[02:38:07] <techalchemy> you can enable travis and use the old travis build on your fork if you want to see the actual status
[06:25:28] <thea> ^ would love any and all eyes on that PR.
[15:48:01] <tomfbiz> dstufft -- I am at pycon sprinting for about 3 more hours. Any thoughts on something small I might work on? Could be researching a ticket that someone else could complete.
[17:14:01] <tomfbiz> dstufft -- I fixed test errors and lint errors. There is still one travis failure, but from what I can tell, that is not related to my PR. Can you confirm?
[17:38:22] <cooperlees> I was just saying to tomfbiz 1 mins before your PR came up he should just do the diff to remove 3.3 support
[17:38:47] <cooperlees> I'd love to see anonymous stats from Warehouse's perspective the use of CPython and PIP versions. Would love to work on that :)
[17:46:45] <tomfbiz> dstufft: I grabbed the .travis.yml part of your PR for removing python 3.3 so that my PR pass all CI passes before I leave Cleveland
[18:43:27] <cooperlees> EWDurbin: You around at sprints still?
[18:43:37] <cooperlees> Just want to talk about getting a test API up to let people have a play etc.
[18:44:19] <cooperlees> Thinking possibly a separate container where we only run the new api on, and somehow only turn it on within that instance and people can get readonly access and use my client to see what the data looks like
[18:57:08] <dstufft> cooperlees: We probably don't want to start deploying anything to pypi.org until we have more agreement on the exact shape of the API, I know that techalchemy wants to be part of that, and thea has expressed concerned about hypermedia vs an RPC based API and I need to spend some time with what y'all have worked on now that I'm home and can really dig into it :)
[18:58:21] <techalchemy> I don't have a formal allocation for how much time I can spend on open source but i'm pretty sure i've exceeded it this week :p
[18:58:42] <dstufft> yea, and folks probably need some time to recouperate from PyCon :)
[19:04:16] <cooperlees> Yeah, I would love to just get a initial poc up to allow people to see it and comment ... and allow easy iteration and leave it at alpha.pypi.org until ready
[19:05:43] <cooperlees> Ernest just showed us routes and how he’d want it. We’re gonna copy the forklift / upload setup and then Ernest said he can separate / protect it