Log file Viewer

[06:09:03] <pradyunsg> @di_codes -- coming from https://github.com/pypa/warehouse/issues/2996#issuecomment-521405355 -- IIRC, based on a chat I had with Nick at PyCon US, we would continue to use PEPs for metadata updates. The specification living on packaging.python.org, because it's a good place to hold the "current state" of the specification, rather than having to look at multiple PEPs to get to know that.

[08:00:45] <pombreda> pradyunsg: I would need to know sooner than later then ;) https://github.com/pypa/packaging.python.org/pull/635

[08:01:05] <pradyunsg> I see my name!

[08:01:12] <pombreda> pradyunsg: do you mind to chime in on the PR with this info :)

[08:01:30] <pradyunsg> pombreda: hehe, sure. :)

[08:01:34] <pombreda> thanks

[08:01:58] <pombreda> I had started a PEP way back when. So I can review this alright :)

[08:05:39] <pradyunsg> pombreda: yea -- status quo is that we write a PEP for anything that affects more than 1 tool. If there's interoperability involved, it is PEP material.

[08:07:00] <pradyunsg> pombreda: chimed in on the PR on PyPUG.

[08:19:59] <pombreda> pradyunsg: thanks. So let me craft a PEP too. Should I discuss this first on distutils-sig?

[08:20:19] <pombreda> pradyunsg: or where do you reckon would be the best place to have the discussion?

[08:21:24] <pradyunsg> pombreda: If someone asks me distutils-sig, I'm inclined to say discuss.python.org.

[08:21:33] <pradyunsg> But oh geez, it's down.

[08:23:36] <pradyunsg> Hmm... it seems like that was transient. It's working for me now.

[08:47:58] <pombreda> pradyunsg: ok, so discuss.python.org it will be...

[08:48:13] <pradyunsg> pombreda: \o/

[14:25:48] <pombreda> pradyunsg: https://github.com/python/peps/pull/1148 :)

[14:35:05] <pombreda> and pradyunsg: https://discuss.python.org/t/improving-license-clarity-with-better-package-metadata/2154

[14:37:52] <pombreda> di_codes: ^