[10:32:06] <pradyunsg> andersk pombreda_ and anyone else interested in the GitHub 500s I was getting, it is GitHub Actions CI related. https://twitter.com/pradyunsg/status/1180061573768830976
[10:49:11] <pradyunsg> andersk: I reviewed your PR -- https://github.com/pypa/pip/pull/7132/files. Please rebase on master, to workaround the broken GitHub Actions CI. :)
[13:44:23] <pombreda_> feedback is welcomed on https://github.com/pombredanne/spdx-pypi-pep/issues/7 and https://github.com/pombredanne/spdx-pypi-pep/issues/6
[13:44:41] <pradyunsg> Oh yea. They're both the same issue body.
[13:44:44] <pombreda_> as well as anyone who cares about packaging metadata being updated by a ne PEP
[13:45:26] <pombreda_> pradyunsg: actually they mistakenly had the same title... the body is different
[13:45:38] <pradyunsg> Oh right. That makes sense!
[13:46:06] <pombreda_> pradyunsg: I hope that you can provide some feedback on substance too :P
[13:53:00] <pombreda_> and for background here is the latest PEP draft https://github.com/pombredanne/spdx-pypi-pep/blob/b82a54ef06c1e7bf4783982477d81b35c79aabd3/pep-9999.rst
[14:45:48] <pradyunsg> I'll take a look in ~24 hours!
[17:26:32] <sangy> pombreda_: is this just related to licensing on the spdx side or are you trying to get more spdx-relevant metadata encoded on pypi?
[20:28:38] <pombreda_> sangy: this is strictly to add "structured" licensing with SPDX license expressions and nothing more.