Log file Viewer

[17:22:21] <cooperlees> go techalchemy

[17:22:40] <cooperlees> Release that piping!

[17:22:43] <cooperlees> *env

[17:36:37] <pradyunsg> toad_polo: https://github.com/pypiserver/pypiserver/issues/new — reach out and check if they’re willing to clarify how their project relates to pypi.org (and warehouse) in their README?

[17:37:33] <toad_polo> ^tos9

[17:38:05] <pradyunsg> cnx: the generic build tool will be a separate project, yea. It’s nothing other than "we should do this" agreement among a lot of stakeholders today. :)

[17:38:27] <pradyunsg> toad_polo: whoops, sorry! I blame my tab completion. :P

[18:15:19] <PSFSlack> <deveshkusingh> pradyunsg: \o

[18:15:35] <PSFSlack> <deveshkusingh> Is there going to be a 20.1.1 release this month?

[18:44:38] <tos9> pradyunsg: yeah probably a good idea ( toad_polo thanks for the ping )

[18:54:28] <tos9> https://github.com/pypiserver/pypiserver/issues/307

[23:04:19] <travis-ci> pypa/pip#16098 (master - 5cac4dc : Pradyun Gedam): The build passed.

[23:04:19] <travis-ci> Change view : https://github.com/pypa/pip/compare/d812fc232778444256552343003ec0030232ee40...5cac4dc6bd4c2150380d5368f2541357364b5d4b

[23:04:19] <travis-ci> Build details : https://travis-ci.org/pypa/pip/builds/685434394

[23:35:04] <tos9> OK looks like the maintainer already responded -- does anyone have an opinion about the specific language I wrote in https://github.com/pypiserver/pypiserver/issues/307#issue-615453211