Log file Viewer
Help
|
Karma
| Search:
#pypa logs for Saturday the 3rd of January, 2015
(
Back to #pypa overview
) (
Back to channel listing
) (
Animate logs
)
[
00:43:41
] <
KingInTheNorth
> im having some problems with pip freeze. Just gives me an error.
[
00:53:08
] <
KingInTheNorth
> http://pastebin.com/MkmbCJeW error message
[
12:48:23
] <
ronny_
> hi
[
12:48:50
] <
ronny_
> whats the current state on using something like setup.cfg instead of setup.py?
[
12:49:48
] <
dstufft
> ronny_: setup.py is what is used and will be until PEP 426 is completed
[
12:50:26
] <
agronholm
> ronny_: but you can do things with setup.cfg you can't with setup.py
[
12:50:27
] <
dstufft
> well even after that really
[
12:50:44
] <
ronny_
> dstufft: and whats the state of art wrt having a minimal 1-line setup.py + a reasonable confirming setup.cfg
[
12:51:17
] <
dstufft
> upstream packaging isn't going to be using a setup.cfg, it's a bad format.
[
12:51:23
] <
dstufft
> pbr lets you do something like what you want though
[
12:51:30
] <
dstufft
> 4 line setup.py + setjup.cfg
[
12:51:54
] <
ronny_
> dstufft: is there any mechanism to get the version information from scm tags intended?
[
12:52:10
] <
dstufft
> ronny_: pbr has that as well yes
[
12:52:16
] <
dstufft
> assuming you use git
[
12:52:33
] <
dstufft
> the python tooling isn't focusing on package author tooling
[
12:52:47
] <
dstufft
> PEP 426 defines what a package looks like, with a static JSON file
[
12:52:57
] <
dstufft
> and how that gets created we don't care
[
12:53:05
] <
dstufft
> certainly setuptools/setup.py will be one way
[
12:53:10
] <
ronny_
> does pbr have a an entryppoint to add other scms?
[
12:53:17
] <
ronny_
> currently im using setup.py + hgdistver
[
12:53:19
] <
dstufft
> ronny_: don't think so
[
12:53:30
] <
ronny_
> hmm, meh, then its a pain
[
12:53:40
] <
ronny_
> i use hg for all my packages
[
12:55:24
] <
calston
> packaging is a pain? never
[
12:59:10
] <
ronny
> dstufft: who is responsible for pbr?
[
12:59:18
] <
dstufft
> openstack
[
13:03:33
] <
ronny
> hmm, i see
[
16:28:34
] <
ionelmc
> was there some tool to pull pypi stats for all your packages?
[
17:13:18
] <
tos9
> ionelmc: vanity IIRC
[
19:56:44
] <
azyr
> can i somehow ask pip what kind of extras does some package have? by extras i mean something like "ipython[notebook]"