Log file Viewer

[00:14:44] <recheck> [so-pip] Error using Google translate from command line → https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58035406/error-using-google-translate-from-command-line

[03:15:44] <ngoldbaum> so who added this recheck bot to the channel? it's generating a lot of spam

[08:36:36] <recheck> [so-setuptools] How can I make pip install package data (a config file)? → https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58038169/how-can-i-make-pip-install-package-data-a-config-file

[08:45:45] <recheck> [so-virtualenv] Unable to activate an virtualenv in Jupyter notebook → https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58038394/unable-to-activate-an-virtualenv-in-jupyter-notebook

[09:19:33] <recheck> [so-pip] Why does pip claim that I have an incompatible module despite a correct version (and breaks a docker build)? → https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58038229/why-does-pip-claim-that-i-have-an-incompatible-module-despite-a-correct-version

[10:33:23] <nedbat> ngoldbaum: it's zbr|ruck's

[12:17:52] <recheck> [so-pip] How to install wordcloud using pip in python 3.7 → https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54758993/how-to-install-wordcloud-using-pip-in-python-3-7

[12:17:54] <recheck> [so-pip] what should i do am getting Error while installing tensoflow → https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58037436/what-should-i-do-am-getting-error-while-installing-tensoflow

[15:01:37] <ngoldbaum> zbr|ruck: the recheck bot makes it difficult for me to see when actual discussion happens in here :/

[15:02:11] <ngoldbaum> zbr|ruck: I guess I can block the bot but I think the bot is making this channel less useful :/

[15:06:52] <tos9> I /ignore'd it immediately, but yeah I can imagine everyone having to do that is not great.

[15:12:08] <ngoldbaum> zbr|ruck: I also seriously doubt it's encouraging anyone to answer these SO questions, there's just too many of them

[15:18:10] <ngoldbaum> di_codes: hi i think we're chatting on a warehouse github thread, happy to chat here as well :)

[15:33:10] <recheck> [so-pip] Installing python module within code → https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12332975/installing-python-module-within-code

[17:51:25] <recheck> [so-virtualenv] Should I be installing virtualenvwrapper globally? → https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58042065/should-i-be-installing-virtualenvwrapper-globally

[18:02:15] <recheck> [so-pip] Including unit tests in (test.)pypi package → https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56306403/including-unit-tests-in-test-pypi-package

[18:02:17] <recheck> [so-pip] lxml error when running sugiyama.py on Mac → https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57898440/lxml-error-when-running-sugiyama-py-on-mac

[23:05:37] <catern> if I have entry_points={'distutils.setup_keywords': ['something' = 'mything']} in my setup() call, is it somehow possible to use that newly defined keyword in my setup() call? in other words, I want my package to provide a new setup keyword, but I also want to use that in my setup.py for my package

[23:06:32] <ngoldbaum> i think you would need to monkeypatch setuptools for that to work

[23:09:54] <catern> can I, somehow, maybe, make a second call to setup() after it's seen the distutils.setup_keyword and generated the appropriate files for it to be registered?

[23:12:43] <ngoldbaum> no idea

[23:12:57] <ngoldbaum> out of curiosity why do you want to do this?

[23:13:08] <ngoldbaum> couldn't you have the thing that provides the keyword you want be its own thing

[23:13:16] <ngoldbaum> and then the things that need to consume that thing can depend on it?

[23:23:41] <catern> sure, I could, but they're both pretty related, and moreover, if the thing that provides the keyword was a separate package, that would make development more complicated

[23:25:28] <catern> i'd have to change the layout of my source tree (not a big deal), it would be harder to hack on the two of them together (a slightly bigger deal), and it would be more complex to describe how to use it if it was split into two packages

[23:25:47] <catern> (the last being the most important)

[23:26:11] <catern> i suppose i could create a package that is purely an implementation detail and try to discourage users from directly installing it

[23:27:17] <catern> but that's a bit weird to do for something that's just a packaging issue

[23:47:26] <catern> since it would need to be separate on pypi etc