Log file Viewer

[09:28:09] <jhermann> richmoore3, / tos9 : my angle was more non-technical, lack of pressure to switch over, no obvious business value in doing so, plain ignorance / inertia ;), etc.

[11:46:05] <pdurbin> jhermann: do you have a blog post about it?

[11:48:24] <jhermann> nope. just went through the ipv6 adoption process (which of course is still unfinished), and thus see the similarities quite clearly ☺

[12:23:46] <pdurbin> oh

[13:01:30] <ztane> yes, even in the case of ipv6, it ought to be adopted, but no effort to adopt it is done bc eq need to be updated to support it...

[13:01:49] <ztane> ... and while the eq is not updated, then there are no customers using ipv6, so the software does not need to be updated either

[13:02:23] <ztane> ... and that is why there is no pressing issue to update the eq as everyone is using software that wouldnt support ipv6 anyhow

[13:02:59] <ztane> anyone saying that ipv4 is good enough ought to die a slow and painful death however.

[13:50:56] <moo-_-> ztane: I can guarantee you, everybody dies

[13:55:21] <regebro> Not Python 2. It will live on forever! Well make our money when we are 60 years old by maintaining old Plone sites. Trust me on this. I have seen the future.

[14:17:13] <moo-_-> so Plone is new COBOL

[14:40:21] <pdurbin> :)